The high sales figures of native apps seemingly bear evidence. However, do these native, customized applications really outsmart the web apps on all counts? Let’s take a look:
Speed – This round also goes to native mobile applications. When you purchase and install an app from a Blackberry or iPhone app development companies, it automatically becomes a part of your handset’s built-in features. As such, launching them on compatible handsets hardly takes more than a few seconds. Web apps, due to their requirement of fairly strong Internet connectivity at all times, are typically slower.
Creation – As far as the process of mobile application development is concerned, native apps do win hands down. Since they are customized for the different mobile platforms, the entire coding is done by the in-house developers of app companies. Detecting bugs (if any) and releasing updates is easier and monitoring the application analytics becomes a cinch too. The time factor is a concern, though, and we will come to that later.
Requirement of internal memory – Native applications require a certain, pre-specified amount of memory space in handsets – for functioning in an efficient manner. That’s precisely why so much importance is given on selecting a mobile app development framework that would not consume too much of the available bandwidth on smartphones. Since web apps do not need any extra memory space to be launched and operated, their convenience is definitely higher on this count.
Security – While getting visibility on the app stores can be a rather time-consuming process, the procedure can work in favor of native apps too. People can rest assured that a mobile application which has been quality-tested and approved by leading app stores would be bug-free and completely secure (both in terms of its operation, as well as its effects on the phone on which it is used). No such assurance is available for web apps, although the more well-known ones can be easily trusted.
Monitoring app performance – Way more challenging for native apps, than it is for web-based applications. A mobile application development company specializing in native app-creation would typically have to develop multiple versions of each app – depending on the platform (iPhone, Blackberry, or Android) on which it would be used. The analytics for each of these versions have to be tracked to get an idea of how the application is performing. get some tips from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/nagpur/city-based-app-developers-bag-award-from-facebook/articleshow/59208743.cms
Cost factor – From the perspective of professional app developers, the mobile application development cost for native apps is significantly higher than that of the web-based ones. Applications that are compatible across several platforms, in particular, can be rather pricey. The average time required to create prototypes of native apps is also higher. If you prefer native applications, you’ll have to wait longer!
Maintenance – Since native apps generally involve customized coding for the different development platforms, their maintenance is deemed to be at least slightly more challenging than that for web apps. The latter typically have a cross-platform single coding involved, making the task of modifications (if required) easier as well.
At times, it can be difficult to keep a tab on which version of a native app someone is using, which makes rolling out upgrade plans rather difficult. In terms of quality and performance though, these native applications are mostly better than web apps.…